God and Tobacco
Jun. 30th, 2006 10:18 amFrom a Decatur (Illinois) Herald & Review story on local hospitals banning smoking on their premises, starting July 4:
Taylor said she feels it would be inconceivable to ban smoking in a person's car.
"When you've got somebody in (the hospital), you need a break for a cigarette," she said. "I'll smoke in my car if I (want to). Only 14 percent of people are against God, but the 86 percent of people who believe in him are getting their rights taken away in public areas. Now it's working its way down to cigarettes. Next, they're going to tell us we can't smoke in our own homes."
When they said that it was inappropriate for the Ten Commandments to be posted in courtrooms, I didn't say anything because I wasn't a fundamentalist looney. When they said that it was inappropriate for someone to fire up a cancer stick at Marlboro Man Memorial while Uncle Clem was having most of his emphysematic lungs taken out, I didn't say anything...
Taylor said she feels it would be inconceivable to ban smoking in a person's car.
"When you've got somebody in (the hospital), you need a break for a cigarette," she said. "I'll smoke in my car if I (want to). Only 14 percent of people are against God, but the 86 percent of people who believe in him are getting their rights taken away in public areas. Now it's working its way down to cigarettes. Next, they're going to tell us we can't smoke in our own homes."
When they said that it was inappropriate for the Ten Commandments to be posted in courtrooms, I didn't say anything because I wasn't a fundamentalist looney. When they said that it was inappropriate for someone to fire up a cancer stick at Marlboro Man Memorial while Uncle Clem was having most of his emphysematic lungs taken out, I didn't say anything...
no subject
Date: 2006-06-30 04:02 pm (UTC)I would think that a hospital is the one place where we would agree that people shouldn't be able to smoke -- if only because, unlike, say, a bar, non-smokers can't exactly choose not to go to the hospital. And, as you note, several people end up in the hospital because they smoked. I would think that hospitals would be trying to actively discourage smoking.
And since you can't smoke next to the person's bedside anyway, even going to a designated smoking area is still leaving them. So how precisely does that differ from leaving to go smoke in your car?
*************
On another note, I've watched someone die of lung cancer.
I never smoked before that, but now I avoid second-hand smoke whenever possible.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-30 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-30 05:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-30 06:29 pm (UTC)I think that the hospitals are banning smoking both for the reasons that Mari cites above, and also because they're trying to limit their health insurance liability both now and in the future. One thing that the article mentions is that hospital employees can buy nicotine patches at wholesale prices. I know that smoking serves other functions for people--such as giving an excuse to get the hell away from annoying coworkers and managers for a few minutes--but at least they wouldn't be jonesing.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-30 06:38 pm (UTC)